Pakistan Christian TV

Breaking news and world news from Pakisthan Christian TV on Business, Sports, Culture. Video news. News from the US, Europe, Asia Pacific, Africa, Middle East, America.

“Al-Hilal’s statement is not that strong legally, and it is required to prove non-incitement, not victory.”

“Al-Hilal’s statement is not that strong legally, and it is required to prove non-incitement, not victory.”

Lawyer Saud Al-Rumman described Al-Hilal’s statement regarding his appeal against the decisions of the Dispute Resolution Chamber regarding the case of his midfield player, Muhammad Kanoo, who is disputed with Al-Nasr, as legally weak, and he refuted what was stated in it and responded to it with complete clarity.

Al-Hilal yesterday officially announced that it had filed an appeal with the Saudi Sports Arbitration Center against the decisions of the Dispute Resolution Chamber of the Saudi Football Association, and described in his statement those decisions as unfair.

The Kanno case exploded last January after Al Hilal announced the renewal of his contract for the next 3 seasons, after which Al Nasr issued a statement announcing the player’s signature. All parties submitted a complaint to the Saudi Football Association with its various committees, which issued its decisions a few days ago on the case.

What was stated in Al Hilal’s statement regarding his appeal against the decisions of the Kno case?

Dispute resolution obligated Kno and Al-Hilal in solidarity to pay a compensation of 27 million Saudi riyals to Al-Nassr. It also suspended the player for 4 months, and he has already missed the team’s last two matches in the Saudi League, and also suspended the club from registering new players for two transfer periods.

Al-Hilal, during an official statement, described those decisions as unfair and strongly attacked the timing of their issuance, noting that choosing the Eid al-Fitr holiday to announce the resolution of disputes for penalties deprived the club and the player from taking the necessary measures, as well as delaying them from submitting an appeal to the Sports Arbitration Center.

See also  Mohamed Salah requires a huge salary for Liverpool. He wants to equal him with the two stars of City and does not think about Ronaldo

Al-Hilal stressed that the decisions of the Dispute Resolution Chamber are right in many points that will be detailed in the appeal memorandum, and the club gave an example in its statement that officials in “disputes” ignore the most important principles of the judiciary, which is that the burden of proof falls on the plaintiff, explaining that victory was not asked to prove a charge Incitement to the crescent.