A year has passed, but the origin of the epidemic remains a mystery, with China back on the dock. The European Union, the United States and other countries, but especially the World Health Organization, have accused Beijing of not having full access to the data, compromising the outcome of the mission in Wuhan last January. In the wake of these new allegations, the hypothesis that the virus leaked from a laboratory is circulating again, which is not archived, in fact: the World Health Organization itself, today, has asked for further investigations.
Covit, Origin of the virus according to the WHO: “It may have gone from animal to human”
The report, prepared by international experts commissioned by the WHO and their Chinese counterparts after the first outbreak of the epidemic, estimated that the now-published Kovit-19 had been transmitted from bats to humans via an alien animal. The virus escaped from a laboratory “very unlikely”. The UN says the work of scientists is “important” but has limited itself in categorizing persistent hypotheses based on their reliability, without providing conclusive results. The director of the company Tetros Adonom Capreius said at a conference with member states. Feedback has already been expressed.
The most unexpected, however, was the attack on China. The WHO leader, who has been accused by some in recent months of surrendering to Beijing, said he was concerned that the international team would have difficulty accessing source data during a visit to Wuhan. He called for more “accurate and complete” sharing of data. A senior Ethiopian official at the time reiterated the need for “further investigations” into the hypothesis of a “virus leak from a laboratory” through “new tasks of specialists”. So, escaping back from the lab, it was at the center of conspiracy theories, but also Western criticism of China. Lack of transparency and lack of time in sharing his information after the first cases of epidemics.
America is concerned
Similarly, the United States and 13 allies expressed “concern” over the outcome of the WHO panel’s investigation in Wuhan and urged China to provide “full access to experts”. While the report was considered an “effective first step” by the EU, it required “further inquiries” and, above all, “access to all relevant places and all available data”. However, while waiting for full light on Govt-19, the international community is trying to combine its efforts to better deal with future crises.
About twenty world leaders, from Drake to Merkel and from Macron to Johnson, have signed a petition calling for a new agreement to prepare and respond to epidemics. The plan, introduced by EU Council President Michael, is due to be discussed at the General Assembly of 194 WHO member states in May. Tetros’ goal is a holistic approach to new crises because “Govt has highlighted the weaknesses and divisions of our communities” and has increased inequalities between rich and poor. In fact, key G20 members such as the United States, Russia, China, Japan, India and Brazil are missing from the signatories to the appeal, but the WHO has promised to receive positive signals from Beijing and Washington.
Last Updated: 20:25