All actions of the food chain are consistent with the basic principles laid out in the strategy From farm to fork They are fully aware that you need continuous and significant improvement to ensure a sustainable approach to our food systems. Several recently published studies of the farm-to-fork strategy suggest that if current targets are implemented as designed, they will represent a significant cost to EU farmers and jeopardize the viability of European agriculture as a whole. As for the political outreach in the farm-to-fork strategy, it has expired. It is now time to analyze the currently available data. In recent months, several attempts and the first major studies have attempted to assess and change the effects of the duties outlined by the European Commission.
Studies by the USDA, the HFFA Research Institute, the European Union Joint Research Center (JRC), the University of Kiel, and the University and Research Center Wageningen (WUR) have revealed that there are many significant impacts and deaf cities that require a lot of political attention in the EU.
- The JRC study predicts that the expected reduction of between 40 and 60% of greenhouse gas emissions from European agriculture resulting from the implementation of farm-to-fork will result in the transfer of European agricultural production, including its emissions, to the land.
- A Kiel University study hypothesized that Europe could become a net importer of food, which goes against the open strategic autonomy that the European Commission has supported during the coronavirus crisis.
- A USDA study found that the definitions defined in the farm-to-fork strategy could lead to 22 million people being food insecure.
pro se europe nedv on me?
These studies, each using a different methodology and having different inputs and limitations, complement each other. Everyone comes to the same coup. Agricultural production in the European Union has fallen relatively dramatically in some regions and in some products. In terms of the cumulative impact of tariffs, the latest WUR study showed an average production decline of 10-20% with a 30% reduction for some crops.
Regarding animal production, a study from Kiel University showed a 20% reduction in beef production in the European Union and a 17% reduction in pork production. The WUR policy document confirms the overall decline in beef, pork, and dairy and dairy production, which will not only lead to higher prices for EU consumers, but will thus demonstrate debatable effects on farmers’ incomes.
The data clearly shows the effects on trade, farmers’ income, and ultimately consumer prices. Changing the diet under these conditions would be difficult, and the introduction of excise duties, as proposed by the European Parliament, could cause its social injustice.
All businesses in the agro-food chain are aware of the environmental and climate challenges we face today. We are all determined to do our part in the fight against mitigating the negative effects of climate change. European agricultural production is one of the most environmentally friendly resources. However, European producers believe that with innovation and continued support for the EU’s agricultural policy, farmers will continue to produce in a sustainable way. Let’s acknowledge the company and policy makers in food production. The policy, which is not based on data, will have a detrimental effect on European agriculture. We need to create a shift policy based on the data we have at our disposal, the cornerstone of which is innovation.
In order to talk about a full-service eench in Farm to Fork, we need a common challenge to take on. This common approach must be based on the comprehensive and cumulative impact assessment undertaken by the European Commission. A recent study by the University of Wageningen with its various landscapes clearly showed that assessing Farm to Fork in isolation, as the commission envisions, would only provide a portfolio of cumulative reality.
We, like the Committee, are also keen to conclude this discussion on the need for a cumulative impact assessment. We have a thorough assessment because we want to understand where problems are likely to arise so that we can discuss the matter.
“Proud twitter enthusiast. Introvert. Hardcore alcohol junkie. Lifelong food specialist. Internet guru.”